Entrelid Framework
Request Demo
Beyond Encryption: Cryptographic Impossibility in Database Security
This whitepaper explores a revolutionary approach to data security that achieves mathematical impossibility of unauthorized access through information-theoretic security principles, not merely computational complexity.
Executive Summary
Traditional encryption systems rely on computational complexity—making attacks take too long to be practical. We present a fundamentally different paradigm: a system where unauthorized data access is mathematically impossible due to information-theoretic security principles.
Our approach leverages controlled information loss during storage key derivation, creating a scenario where the information required to locate data without proper authorization does not exist. This isn't just "very hard to break"—it's provably impossible to break, even with quantum computing.
This whitepaper demonstrates how our architecture achieves true information-theoretic security through the compression of hundreds of input bits into a 128-bit output, mathematically destroying information necessary for unauthorized recovery.
The Limits of Traditional Encryption
Current database security approaches rely on making attacks computationally expensive. Even "military-grade" encryption merely creates time and resource barriers that could theoretically be overcome with sufficient computing power.
The fundamental problem: Traditional encryption preserves all information in scrambled form. The information needed to decrypt data still exists—it's just hidden behind computational complexity.
As quantum computing advances, these time barriers face unprecedented threats. A new paradigm is required—one where security doesn't depend on how long attacks take, but on the mathematical impossibility of the attack itself.
Traditional encryption is like a very complex lock. Quantum computing might pick that lock faster. Our system is fundamentally different—we make the lock not exist without proper authorization.
Information-Theoretic Security: Beyond Computational Complexity
Computational Security
"Would take too long to break"
Relies on the attack requiring too much time or resources to be practical.
Information-Theoretic Security
"Mathematically impossible to break"
The information needed to break the system does not exist, regardless of computing power.
Information-theoretic security achieves what Claude Shannon defined as "perfect secrecy"—where even an attacker with unlimited computational resources cannot derive the protected information because the mathematical relationship between the encrypted data and the original information is undefined.
Our system implements this through controlled information destruction during the storage key derivation process at run-time, creating a scenario where the information needed to locate data without authorization is permanently lost—not hidden, but eliminated from existence.
The Mathematics of Impossibility
Input Components (600-1000+ bits total)
  • Hierarchical path components: ~200-600+ bits
  • Document UUID: 128 bits
  • System secrets: Hundreds of bits
Output (128 bits only)
Storage key: 128 bits
Mathematical reality: It is impossible to fit 1000+ bits of information into a 128-bit container. The transformation necessarily destroys information—not hides it, but eliminates it from existence.
The transformation process destroys information with each transformation step. This isn't encryption—it's controlled information destruction that preserves only the minimum needed to generate a unique storage address.
Iconization: Controlled Information Destruction
Multiple Input Sources
RDID + Path + UUID + System Secrets (600-1000+ bits)
Multiple Rounds of Iconization
Each round eliminates information through mathematical transformations
Final Storage Key
128-bit key with 80-90% of original information eliminated
Iconization, based on a proprietary method, provides perfect transformation properties:
  • Every possible input maps to a unique 64-bit output
  • The transformation is perfectly distributed with no collisions
  • The process has algebraic properties that standard hashes lack
Unlike standard cryptographic hashing, iconization guarantees unique, evenly distributed outputs while irreversibly destroying information in a controlled manner.
Why Even Quantum Computing Can't Break This
Quantum computers excel at breaking traditional encryption by factoring large numbers and finding patterns. However, they face fundamental limitations:
  • They cannot create information that doesn't exist
  • They cannot reverse information-theoretic losses
  • They cannot reconstruct data that was destroyed during processing
Even with infinite quantum computing power, an attacker would discover millions of different input combinations that all produce the same 128-bit storage key. Without knowing the exact RDID, path, UUID, and system secrets used, there's no way to determine which combination was the actual one.
Astronomical Search Space
The impossibility isn't just about information loss—it's compounded by the vast keyspace:
2^128
Possible Storage Addresses
Approximately 3.4 × 10^38 unique locations
10^19
Years Required
At one trillion checks per second
10^9
Times Longer
Than the universe has existed
But this vastly understates the security. Even if an attacker could check every possible storage key (which is computationally impossible), they have no way to verify if any given key is correct without already possessing the three required security factors.
This creates a perfect information void—attackers cannot even confirm whether data exists, let alone locate it.
The Non-Pivotable Property
Beyond information loss and vast keyspace, our architecture implements a critical property: non-pivotability.
What is Non-Pivotability?
  • Finding one valid storage key provides zero information about any other key
  • No sequential relationship exists between keys
  • No pattern or structure to exploit
  • Each key is informationally isolated
Security Implications
Even in the astronomically unlikely scenario where an attacker found one document, they couldn't use that knowledge to find any other document—not even to confirm the existence of related documents.
This property eliminates entire classes of attacks that rely on pivoting from one piece of information to discover others.
Triple-Factor Dependency
RDID
The Relationship Distributed ID is itself cryptographically derived
Entity Credentials
Authentication factors that verify identity and authorization
Resource Context Path
Hierarchical location information for the specific resource
The mathematical impossibility is compounded because the storage address derivation requires all three factors simultaneously. Missing any single factor doesn't just make access "difficult"—it makes the storage location mathematically undefined. The address literally cannot be computed without all inputs.
This creates a scenario where not only is unauthorized access impossible, but the very existence of data cannot be confirmed without possessing all three factors.
Complete Database Theft = Mathematical Void
In the nightmare scenario of total database compromise, attackers face an impossible challenge:
  • The Storage Keys Tell Nothing: Each 128-bit key could have been generated from millions of different input combinations with no way to determine which inputs were used.
  • No Pattern Recognition: Keys have no relationship to each other. Finding one tells you nothing about finding another.
  • No Proof of Non-Existence: An attacker cannot even prove data doesn't exist—they simply face an endless mathematical void.
Even with complete physical access to the database, attackers face a mathematical void—a space where the information needed to make sense of the data simply does not exist.
Information Loss Visualization
The diagram above visualizes the irreversible information loss during the storage key derivation process:
Input (1000+ bits)
  • RDID: 128+ bits
  • Path components: 200-600+ bits
  • Document UUID: 128 bits
  • System secrets: 300+ bits
Multiple Rounds of Iconization
Each round irreversibly destroys information through mathematical transformation
Output (128 bits)
872+ bits of information: DESTROYED
Not hidden. Not encrypted. Gone.
The Impossibility Guarantee
Traditional Security Claims
  • "Would take billions of years to break" (time barrier)
  • "Computationally infeasible" (resource barrier)
  • "Practically impossible" (probability barrier)
Our Security Reality
  • "Information doesn't exist to break" (mathematical impossibility)
  • "Cannot be reversed even theoretically" (information-theoretic barrier)
  • "Undefined attack surface" (no target to attack)
The critical distinction: We're not making data very hard to find. We're making data have no location to find without the complete relationship context. This is the difference between hiding something very well and having it not exist until the right conditions materialize it.
This isn't security through obscurity—it's security through mathematical certainty based on information theory principles first established by Claude Shannon.
For the Non-Mathematician

Simplified Explanation
Imagine taking a full novel and reducing it to a single word through a one-way process. No amount of computing power—classical or quantum—can reconstruct the novel from that word because the information simply isn't there.
Our storage keys work exactly this way. We take extensive information about relationships, paths, and secrets, and compress them through mathematical operations that destroy most of the information, keeping only a 128-bit result.
Even if someone stole every storage key we have, they couldn't determine what information was destroyed to create each key, making reverse engineering impossible—not just difficult, but mathematically undefined.
Think of it this way: If you burn 100 different documents and each produces exactly 10 grams of ash, you cannot reconstruct which document created any particular pile of ash. The information is gone, not hidden.
The Ultimate Assurance: Mathematical Certainty, Not Just Security
With Entrelid, we don't hide your data behind better locks. We make your data exist in a mathematical space that cannot be navigated without the proper relationship context. This isn't an opinion or a very large number—it's mathematical certainty based on information theory. The information needed to find your data without authorization doesn't exist, cannot be created, and cannot be discovered. That's not security through obscurity—that's security through mathematical impossibility.
Even with unlimited quantum computing power, attackers can't find your data without possessing all three required security factors. This revolutionary approach achieves what traditional encryption cannot—true information-theoretic security that makes unauthorized access mathematically undefined, not just computationally difficult.